[Linux-sig-planning] Re: [Linux-sig] Linux SIG meeting
Nancy J. Christolear
[Address Concealed]
Mon Aug 16 22:35:07 EDT 2004
Grant, Here, Here!!
Paul, If you really feel that way and since you do you probably won't be
at Computerfest, then don't stay in the room for that part of the
meeting. No one is chaining you to a desk!
HMMMMM.......?
Nancy
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 22:14, Grant Root wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2004 at 21:37, Paul Visscher wrote:
>
> > Dave Lundy [lundyd at dmapub.dma.org] said:
> > > I've updated our events page for the August meeting to read "We will
> > > meet in Russ Engineering Center, room 145. Andy Grimm will discuss
> > > PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) this month. We will also do
> > > final planning for the SIG booth at Computerfest. And, if there's
> > > time, Dale Williams will discuss an embedded Linux project he's been
> > > working on. Otherwise he'll present it at the September meeting."
> >
> > I think it is important to not dedicate too much time to computer fest
> > planning. I think the views of the new people, and some of the regulars
> > (myself *excluded*!) is that the computer fest discussion is
> > Administrivia and doesn't really concern them. And I think they are
> > right. I think we should do it at the end of the meeting, after
> > announcing where we're eating.
>
> I have to disagree. The Computerfest booth is one of the group's most
> visible activities, and it's appropriate to spend some time at the
> general meetings planning it. It's important that everyone feel he
> knows what's going on and has some involvement.
>
> I've also found that new people get integrated into a group most
> sucessfully when they get a chance to make a contribution, even doing
> "grunt work" -- such as by manning a booth or helping with setup.
>
> But I'm not planning on spending tons of time on it, unless the other
> members have a lot of questions or concerns.
>
> > But that's just my (not so humble) opinion. Please feel free to call me
> > names and/or throw things at me when you see me. :)
>
> We'll do that anyway, of course.
More information about the Linux-SIG-Planning
mailing list